#StudentSuccessUS: Overcoming Common Barriers to Student Success: A Conversation With Tim Renick

      Comments Off on #StudentSuccessUS: Overcoming Common Barriers to Student Success: A Conversation With Tim Renick
#StudentSuccessUS: Overcoming common barriers to student success: A conversation with Tim Renick
(Last Updated On: November 23, 2023)

Welcome to our latest blog post, where we dive into the enlightening discussion from the Student Success US 2023 conference. The session, “Overcoming common barriers to student success: A conversation with Tim Renick,” was moderated by Doug Lederman, Editor and co-founder of Inside Higher Ed, and featured insights from Timothy Renick, the Founding Executive Director of the National Institute for Student Success.

Tim Renick’s Vision on Student Success

Tim Renick, a renowned expert in student success, shared valuable insights at the conference. He discussed Georgia State University’s journey in improving graduation rates and eliminating equity gaps. This transformation was achieved through strategic initiatives focusing on data-driven decision-making and proactive student support.

Challenges in Higher Education

Renick highlighted several systemic issues plaguing large enrollment campuses. These include the complexities of navigating college systems like admissions, registration, and financial aid. Renick emphasized the need for these systems to evolve from being part of the problem to becoming part of the solution.

The Power of Empirical Data

Tim Renick’s approach to improving student success heavily relies on empirical research. This method involves collecting and analyzing data to make informed decisions rather than relying on anecdotal evidence or traditional practices.

Key Elements of Empirical Data Usage in Renick’s Work:

  • Extensive Data Collection: Renick’s team conducted surveys at over 500 colleges, amassing a vast amount of data. This comprehensive approach ensures a broad understanding of the issues at hand.
  • Identifying Gaps in Implementation: The data revealed significant gaps between the intentions of higher education institutions and their actual execution. For example, while many schools have strategic plans focusing on student outcomes, the practical applications in critical areas like advising and financial wellness are often inadequate.
  • Evidence-Based Decision Making: Empirical research enables institutions to make decisions based on evidence. This approach is more likely to yield positive results compared to decisions made on assumptions or untested theories.
  • Benchmarking and Best Practices: The collected data helps in benchmarking against best practices in the industry. Schools can compare their performance with others and identify areas for improvement.
  • Customized Interventions: By understanding specific shortcomings, schools can develop targeted interventions. For instance, if data shows a particular weakness in advising, resources can be allocated specifically to enhance this area.
  • Predictive Analytics: Empirical data is not just about understanding current states but also about predicting future trends. This predictive aspect is crucial in preemptively addressing potential challenges in student success.
  • Closing the Feedback Loop: Continuous collection and analysis of data help in creating a feedback loop. Institutions can implement changes, measure outcomes, and then refine their strategies based on new data.
  • Transparency and Accountability: Data-driven approaches foster a culture of transparency and accountability. When decisions are based on empirical evidence, it’s easier for stakeholders to understand and support them.
  • Challenging Conventional Wisdom: Empirical data can challenge long-held beliefs and practices in higher education, leading to innovative solutions and reforms.
  • Supporting Equity and Inclusion: By highlighting disparities in student outcomes, data can be used to address equity issues, ensuring that interventions are inclusive and beneficial to all students.

Innovative Solutions: Georgia State’s Approach

Georgia State University tackled these challenges head-on. Renick described their innovative use of AI and chatbots, creating a 24/7 support system for students. This approach significantly reduced the ‘summer melt’ rate – the percentage of confirmed incoming students who never attend classes.

Implementing Change: A Leadership Perspective

Tim Renick emphasized that leadership is crucial in initiating and sustaining systemic change within educational institutions. This change is especially important in addressing the complex challenges of student success and equity.

Key Aspects of Leadership in Implementing Change:

  • Visionary Leadership: Leaders must possess a clear and compelling vision for student success. This vision should go beyond traditional educational metrics and focus on holistic development and equity.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: Georgia State’s leadership demonstrated strategic decision-making by aligning resources and policies with their goals for student success. This involved making tough choices, prioritizing initiatives that directly impacted student outcomes.
  • Creating a Culture of Change: Effective leaders foster a culture receptive to change. At Georgia State, this meant encouraging innovation, supporting risk-taking, and being open to new methods of student engagement and support.
  • Data-Driven Approaches: Renick highlighted the importance of data in driving change. Decisions were based on empirical evidence, ensuring that initiatives were targeted and effective.
  • Resource Allocation: Aligning resources with student success goals is a critical step. This includes financial investments in technology and programs, as well as human resources in terms of training and development.
  • Policy Reformation: Reforming existing policies to better support student success was a key strategy. This involved reviewing and amending policies that hindered student progress and implementing new ones that facilitated smoother educational journeys.
  • Breaking Down Silos: Renick’s approach involved breaking down departmental silos to ensure a more integrated and unified approach to student success. This required leadership to encourage collaboration across various departments and faculties.
  • Measuring and Celebrating Success: An important aspect of leadership is to set benchmarks for success and celebrate achievements. Recognizing progress not only motivates the team but also builds momentum for ongoing efforts.
  • Continuous Learning and Adaptation: Leaders must be committed to continuous learning and adaptation. The landscape of higher education is constantly evolving, and staying receptive to new ideas and approaches is crucial.
  • Communication and Transparency: Keeping communication channels open and maintaining transparency about goals, challenges, and successes are vital in driving systemic change.

The Role of Technology

Tim Renick’s perspective on technology in higher education emphasizes its importance, but he also cautions that it’s just a piece of the larger puzzle. The true challenge and opportunity lie in leveraging technology within a broader strategy that includes cultural change and cross-departmental coordination.

Key Aspects of Technology’s Role in Student Success:

  • Technology as a Facilitator, Not a Panacea: Renick views technology as an essential tool that facilitates student success. However, he stresses that technology alone cannot solve the complex issues in higher education. It needs to be part of a holistic approach.
  • Enhancing Student Support Systems: Examples from Georgia State University illustrate how technology, such as AI and chatbots, can enhance student support by providing 24/7 assistance and personalized responses to student queries.
  • Data-Driven Insights: Technology enables the collection and analysis of vast amounts of data, which can be used to make informed decisions, identify at-risk students, and tailor interventions to specific needs.
  • Breaking Down Silos: One of the significant benefits of technology is its ability to bridge gaps between different departments and faculties. Integrated systems ensure that student support is cohesive and not fragmented across different units.
  • Cultural Change and Adoption: For technology to be effective, there must be a cultural shift within the institution. This involves training staff, aligning technology use with institutional goals, and ensuring buy-in from all stakeholders.
  • Customized Learning Experiences: Technology allows for the creation of customized learning experiences that can cater to diverse student needs, learning styles, and backgrounds.
  • Scalability and Efficiency: Automated systems and digital tools can handle tasks at scale, reducing the workload on staff and allowing them to focus on more complex student needs.
  • Continuous Improvement: Technology enables continuous monitoring and improvement of student support initiatives. Institutions can quickly adapt and refine their strategies based on real-time feedback and results.
  • Addressing Equity Gaps: Renick notes that technology can help address equity gaps in education by providing equal access to resources and support for all students, regardless of their background.
  • Preparing Students for a Digital World: Integrating technology in student services also prepares students for the increasingly digital world, equipping them with the skills and familiarity they need for their future careers.

Conclusion: A Path Forward

The discussion concluded with Renick urging institutions to be self-aware and recognize their role in creating and solving problems related to student success. He stressed the importance of using diagnostic tools and technology to provide personalized support, emphasizing that coordinated efforts are key to making a real difference in students’ lives.

#StudentSuccessUS: Overcoming Common Barriers to Student Success: A Conversation With Tim Renick